Mounting worries regarding reliance on technology are transforming Europe’s strategy for public transit and digital security. A sector that was previously calm and effective in Scandinavia is now the focal point of an intense discussion concerning national defense and digital autonomy.
Rising alarms over Chinese-built buses
Public transport providers in Denmark and Norway are facing a possible security vulnerability within their electric bus fleets, particularly in vehicles manufactured by Yutong, the globe’s leading bus producer headquartered in Zhengzhou, China. The problem arises from the buses’ capacity to accept remote software updates and perform diagnostic assessments – a functionality that, despite its technological sophistication, also sparks worries that the vehicles could be disabled or controlled remotely.
Movia, the premier public transportation authority in Denmark, has conceded that this wireless capability could enable an external entity—be it the producer or a cybercriminal—to remotely incapacitate a bus. Jeppe Gaard, Movia’s chief operating officer, clarified that this issue isn’t exclusive to Chinese manufacturers but represents a wider concern linked to the growing digital integration in contemporary vehicles. Both electric cars and buses, he pointed out, are heavily dependent on networked systems that are, theoretically, susceptible to remote access and deactivation.
Since 2019, Movia has incorporated more than 260 Yutong buses into its fleet serving Copenhagen and eastern Denmark. Similar concerns were echoed in Norway, where Ruter, a major public transportation provider, conducted its own investigation. The company carried out controlled tests on both Yutong and Dutch-made VDL buses in secure, underground facilities. The findings showed that while the Dutch models lacked remote update capabilities, Yutong maintained direct digital access to its vehicles for software updates and diagnostics — meaning that, at least theoretically, the buses could be rendered inoperable remotely, even though they could not be remotely driven.
China’s reaction and data security guarantees
Yutong has addressed these allegations by asserting its adherence to global standards and underscoring its dedication to data protection and digital security. The company declared that all vehicle-related data within the European Union is safely stored in an Amazon Web Services data facility situated in Frankfurt, Germany. Yutong additionally guaranteed that all retained information is encrypted, safeguarded by stringent access limitations, and cannot be accessed without explicit customer consent.
Despite these reassurances, European authorities and transit companies remain cautious. The incident has intensified discussions about Europe’s growing dependency on Chinese technology — a relationship characterized by mutual economic benefits but shadowed by deep geopolitical mistrust. Beijing’s alleged involvement in cyber espionage, intellectual property theft, and surveillance activities has led many European leaders to reconsider the long-term implications of their reliance on Chinese suppliers for critical infrastructure.
A broader European dilemma
The examination of Yutong’s buses represents just one recent chapter in Europe’s intricate technological ties with China. Throughout the continent, political leaders are striving to achieve a careful equilibrium: harnessing China’s sophisticated production prowess while simultaneously safeguarding national interests. Recent occurrences, such as the Netherlands’ move to take over the Chinese-owned chip manufacturer Nexperia, have intensified worries that Europe’s automotive and tech industries might encounter significant disturbances should diplomatic or commercial disputes arise.
Many administrations have already implemented measures to restrict susceptibility to potential weaknesses. Several European countries, emulating the United States, have purged Huawei and ZTE apparatus from their 5G infrastructure, citing espionage and data manipulation hazards. Currently, focus has shifted to the rapidly expanding sector of Chinese electric vehicles. As per JATO Dynamics, Chinese EVs saw their market penetration in Europe double in early 2025, surpassing 5% — a statistic that underscores both consumer demand and regulatory apprehension.
China, for its part, has dismissed Western fears as unfounded and politically motivated. Earlier this year, a spokesperson for China’s Foreign Ministry criticized U.S. restrictions on Chinese automotive technology, arguing that such measures “overstretch the concept of national security.” Chinese officials maintain that their companies operate transparently and pose no threat to foreign nations.
Western intelligence concerns
Security specialists throughout Europe, however, maintain a degree of skepticism. Richard Dearlove, the former head of MI6, cautioned that Western administrations are confronting a predicament akin to the one presented by Huawei during the deployment of 5G technology. From his perspective, the growing ubiquity of internet-connected automobiles produced by Chinese companies might introduce novel points of weakness. He posited that, under the most dire circumstances, China could hypothetically incapacitate numerous electric vehicle fleets in prominent urban centers — a situation capable of paralyzing transit systems during an emergency.
Still, some cybersecurity professionals argue that such a scenario, while technically feasible, is unlikely. Ken Munro, founder of the British-American firm Pen Test Partners, noted that any internet-connected vehicle — whether produced by a Western or Chinese company — carries inherent risks of remote interference. Even well-known brands like Tesla, he explained, depend on software connectivity that could be exploited under specific conditions.
In light of these worries, Ruter has put in place several safeguards, such as improved cybersecurity measures, firewalls, and more rigorous scrutiny of upcoming vehicle purchases. The organization is also collaborating with national agencies to define more precise cybersecurity guidelines for public transportation networks. Nevertheless, specialists are still split on the adequacy of these preventative steps. Munro warned that the sole guaranteed way to eradicate the danger would be to entirely disconnect vehicles from the internet — an action that would simultaneously impede the capacity to carry out essential updates and remote upkeep.
The intersection of innovation and vulnerability
The discussion emerging in Scandinavia highlights a wider contradiction of the digital era: the very technologies that facilitate efficiency and progress can simultaneously expose systems to novel types of hazards. As urban centers endeavor to update public transit and decrease carbon output via electrification, they are also compelled to confront issues concerning technological autonomy, information confidentiality, and national defense.
Europe’s dependence on Chinese-manufactured parts and programs reaches well beyond its public transportation systems. From its communication grids to its green energy facilities, the continent’s advancement is profoundly linked to China’s industrial framework. As international conflicts escalate, the task for European countries will involve safeguarding their technological autonomy while continuing their journey towards ecological balance and pioneering development.
The debate over Yutong’s bus fleet highlights a critical point: cybersecurity is now as vital as sustainable power in defining the trajectory of city transportation. This challenge extends beyond a single nation or producer, marking a pivotal moment for the subsequent stage of Europe’s digital evolution.
In the end, as Ken Munro aptly summarized, the debate boils down to one word — trust. And in an increasingly interconnected world, trust may prove to be the most valuable and fragile asset of all.
